For attending students:
The assessment methods will be explained on the first day of class.
For non attending students:
Learning outcomes are assessed through a written examination consisting of four open-ended questions. The questions are designed to evaluate students’ knowledge of the course content, their ability to understand and connect the different topics covered, as well as their capacity to correctly use the concepts and the disciplinary language. The final grade will take into account the level of knowledge acquired, the ability to analyse economic and social phenomena, autonomy of judgement, argumentative skills, clarity of exposition, and the appropriate use of sociological and economic terminology.
Final grades will be based on the level of knowledge and understanding acquired, the ability to apply such knowledge, the degree of autonomy in judgement, communication skills, and learning abilities. More specifically, grades will be awarded according to the following criteria:
Failed examination: the student does not demonstrate the minimum level of knowledge required on the core contents of the course. Understanding of the topics is insufficient, the ability to use specialized terminology is very limited or absent, and there is no adequate capacity to apply the knowledge acquired independently or to provide coherent and well-argued answers.
18–20
Limited and partially inaccurate knowledge of the topics, with technical misunderstandings. Weak ability to apply knowledge. No effective use of technical and specialized language. Inability to relate knowledge to current issues and weak argumentative skills.
21–23
Basic and generally correct knowledge of the main topics, though with some technical inaccuracies. Limited ability to apply knowledge. Minimal use of technical and specialized language. Ability to provide relevant examples, but difficulty in applying knowledge to new or contemporary problems. Weak argumentative skills.
24–26
Sound and technically accurate knowledge of the topics. Good ability to apply acquired competences. Appropriate use of technical and specialized language. Ability to provide relevant examples and to apply knowledge to new and contemporary problems. Argumentation remains limited.
27–29
Advanced knowledge of the topics and solid ability to apply competences at a technical level. Confident use of specialized language, including in the analysis of current issues. Autonomy in logical reasoning and in the use of analytical tools and methods, including the ability to develop coherent research projects. Good evaluative capacity with respect to issues relevant to the field.
30–30 cum laude
Excellent and comprehensive knowledge of the topics, with a high level of technical competence. Full mastery of specialized language, applied effectively to contemporary issues. Strong autonomy in logical reasoning and in the use of analytical tools and methods, including the ability to design coherent research projects. Highly developed evaluative capacity, including awareness of the broader social and political implications. Ability to engage in informed discussion also with subject specialists.
Learning assessment may also be carried out on-line, should the conditions require it.
To ensure equal opportunities and in compliance with current laws, interested students may request a personal interview in order to plan any compensatory and/or dispensatory measures based on educational objectives and specific needs. Students can also contact the CInAP (Centro per l’integrazione Attiva e Partecipa-
ta — Servizi per le Disabilità e/o i DSA) referring teacher within their department (https://www.cinap.unict.it/content/referenti).