POLITICAL AND INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION
Academic Year 2025/2026 - Teacher: DOUGLAS PONTONExpected Learning Outcomes
By the end of the course, students will be able to:
• Analyse economic and political discourse for rhetorical and discursive strategies.
• Recognise and apply concepts such as ethos, pathos, logos, satire, euphemism, and repetition
• Understand how economic narratives (globalisation, crisis, inequality) interact with political persuasion.
• Critically evaluate rhetorical performances from historical, activist, and populist traditions.
• Present independent research in oral form.
Course Structure
Required Prerequisites
Attendance of Lessons
Textbook Information
Course Planning
Subjects | Text References | |
---|---|---|
1 | Lincoln, A. (1863). The Gettysburg Address. | |
2 | Churchill, W. (1940). We Shall Fight on the Beaches. Speech to the House of Commons. | |
3 | King, M.L. (1963). I Have a Dream. Speech, Washington D.C. | |
4 | Thunberg, G. (2019). Speech to the UN Climate Action Summit. | |
5 | Farage, N. (2016). Brexit campaign speeches. | |
6 | Bird, J. & Fortune, J. (2008). The Credit Crunch. The Guardian (video transcript). | |
7 | Goldsmith, J. (1994). The Trap. Macmillan. |
Learning Assessment
Learning Assessment Procedures
Assessment Criteria and Grading Scale
In Italy, examination results are expressed on a scale from 18/30 (minimum pass) to 30/30 (maximum). The highest grade may be awarded with “lode” (cum laude), reserved for outstanding performance. There is no direct equivalence with percentages or GPA, but the system can be understood as ranging from “sufficient” to “excellent,” with an additional level of distinction.
-
Fail (0–17): The student does not demonstrate adequate knowledge of the basic course content and/or has not completed the required work.
-
18–20 (Pass – Sufficient): Minimal knowledge of the subject; very limited ability to apply concepts; significant difficulty in critical discussion.
-
21–24 (Fair – Discrete): Adequate command of course topics; correct but basic exposition; frequent need for guidance.
-
25–27 (Good): Solid knowledge of the subject; ability to handle cases and assignments independently, with only minor inaccuracies.
-
28–30 (Very Good – Excellent): Comprehensive and in-depth knowledge; autonomous ability to make connections between themes and sources; clear exposition with no significant errors.
-
30 cum laude (Distinction): Exceptional performance, marked by originality, critical insight, and virtually complete mastery of the subject.
Examples of frequently asked questions and / or exercises
Explain how Orwell, in Politics and the English Language, links clarity of language to the quality of political thought.
Analyse Greta Thunberg’s UN speech, identifying rhetorical strategies she uses to persuade her audience.
What aspects of globalisation emerge from the Amazon case, and how are they represented linguistically?
Compare the rhetorical strategies of Martin Luther King and Nigel Farage, highlighting both differences and similarities.
In what sense does Schumacher’s Small is Beautiful represent a critique of the dominant economic model?