...............
Academic Year 2025/2026 - Teacher: STEFANIA PAOLA LUDOVICA PANEBIANCOExpected Learning Outcomes
Students acquire Political Science knowledge and capacities to understand international political phenomena that shape global trade.
Course Structure
The International Politics subject relies upon active learning. Alongside traditional academic lectures, attending students are involved in class debate and critical analysis of readings. Students are invited to read beforehand the selected texts. Students are also required to prepare individual or group presentations on topics such as euro-lobbying, 'trade-wars', EU-USA trade relations, the 'protectionist turn' of Trumpism, the global role of BRICS, the impact of energy dependence on political relations, etc. The project work is part of the student-centered active learning process and will be duly evaluated.
Required Prerequisites
Attendance of Lessons
Detailed Course Content
Textbook Information
Compulsory and further readings are made available to students via studium and/or TEAMS and can also be downloaded from the UNICT online library.
Knodt M., Chaban, N. Costa, O. and Mueller, P. (eds) (2026), The Routledge Handbook of the European Union Politics, Routledge, Oxon, pp. 1-27.
Costa O. & Barbé E. (2023) A moving target. EU actorness and the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Journal of European Integration, 45:3, 431-446, DOI:10.1080/07036337.2023.2183394
Freudlsperger, C. and Schramm, L. (2026) ‘External Actors, Pressures and Influences: European Integration and the Outside World’. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.70084.
Hooghe H. & Marks G. (2019) Grand theories of European integration in the twenty-first century, Journal of European Public Policy, 26:8, 1113-1133, DOI:10.1080/13501763.2019.1569711
Course Planning
| Subjects | Text References | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Introduction to the course: topics and teaching methodologies | Syllabus |
| 2 | EU as an international actor | Handbook |
| 3 | Internal and external dimensions | Handbook |
| 4 | Politicization of migration issues | Handbook |
| 5 | Class presentations | To be selected |
| 6 | Class presentations | To be selected |
| 7 | Class presentations | To be selected |
| 8 | Class presentations | To be selected |
| 9 | Class presentations | To be selected |
| 10 | Class presentations | To be selected |
| 11 | Simulations of Negotiations: tecniques | Instructor's guidance |
| 12 | Role games | Instructor's guidance |
| 13 | Role games | Instructor's guidance |
| 14 | Role games | Instructor's guidance |
| 15 | Role games | Instructor's guidance |
| 16 | Research Seminar: how to write a paper | To be selected |
Learning Assessment
Learning Assessment Procedures
His/her knowledge is evaluated as follows: class debate (10%); presentations (25%), critical analysis of the documents (25%), 'project work' - roughly 1000 words (included references) on a topic selected by the students according to their specific interests (40%).
Non-attending classes students will be orally examined on the compulsory readings.
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA AND GRADING SCALE
In Italy, examination results are expressed on a scale from 18/30 (minimum pass) to 30/30 (maximum). The highest grade may be awarded with “lode” (cum laude), reserved for outstanding performance. There is no direct equivalence with percentages, but the system can be understood as ranging from “sufficient” to “excellent,” with an additional level of distinction.
Fail (0–17): The student does not demonstrate adequate knowledge of the basic course content and/or has not completed the required work.
18–20 (Pass – Sufficient): Minimal knowledge of the subject; very limited ability to apply concepts; significant difficulty in critical discussion.
21–24 (Fair – Discrete): Adequate command of course topics; correct but basic exposition; frequent need for guidance.
25–27 (Good): Solid knowledge of the subject; ability to handle cases and assignments independently, with only minor inaccuracies.
28–30 (Very Good – Excellent): Comprehensive and in-depth knowledge; autonomous ability to make connections between themes and sources; clear exposition with no significant errors.
30 cum laude (Distinction): Exceptional performance, marked by originality, critical insight, and virtually complete mastery of the subject.
Examples of frequently asked questions and / or exercises
1. Explain the linkage between EU trade policy and European integration.
2. Analyze EU policy trade as an instrument of EU foreign policy.
3. The effects of crisis (e.g. euro-crisis, Brexit, COVID19) upon EU as a normative power.
4. Is trade (still) a 'neutral' topic in EU agenda?
5. Is the EU still engaged in multilateralism and trade liberalization?
6. Has the EU (still) a unique voice in global trade?
7. Lobbying techniques at EU-level: effective strategies.
8. EU and trade wars.